Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie websites that are streaming where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either it was an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When working with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all of the time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this is certainly one worker who keeps his equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a very man that is quiet. He just strolled in very calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There had been several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and control of an unpleasant weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The next of those two stories is a bit more terrifying, while the axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the employees at a wagering store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant with the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of cash,’ plus the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up on the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposition that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is associated with the concept that neighboring communities is suffering from casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos ought to be opened in the beginning. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, was one of a handful of candidates whom have recommended that all of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that would be located in East Boston, for instance.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed benefits.’
Based on the state laws that produced the chance for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate payment, with arbitration needed if the gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t arrived at an answer by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power throughout the entire vote. In other terms, the casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the complete city to be able to be approved.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% were in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii because the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the activities book cookie container after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier sports betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the big donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a many gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘I know there is certainly huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling up with wagering shops and cash advance businesses that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public places and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very unusual for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
However, fighting back in the corner for the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna claimed that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance aided by the guidelines and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for company, as well as for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And while Goulden is not any longer head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a completely innocent donation or not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party may just be looking to destroy the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this type of hard stance against the spread of the industry in his neighborhood constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he truly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is thought to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year his office ended up being accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to exhibit comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.